You have a point, it doesn't definitely prove anything, or even heavily imply. It merely makes a logical trail that one could use to assume they don't have it. I'm not sure you mean by
What exactly points to this explicitly? Also, I don't think it would be "weird" for Whitebeard to not have King's Haki. Instead, I think of it as evidence that Haki is genetic, or not something that can strictly be learned.everything points to knocking fodders out being something only those with the King's Haki are capable of.




Reply With Quote
