View Poll Results: Are you satisfied with the latest OP eps (animation & art wise)

Voters
700. You may not vote on this poll
  • I don't see any problem with them, so, yes I am

    272 38.86%
  • hmmm..maybe

    194 27.71%
  • No!

    234 33.43%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 157 FirstFirst ... 2 10 11 12 13 14 22 62 112 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 240 of 3126

Thread: A Study of One Piece Animation

  1. #221
    move over anpanman shinpanman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Maryland

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by goty View Post
    I'm realizing Takagi is seriously the most underrated animation director. He's leagues ahead of Masayuki Fujita/Kenji Yokoyama and fairly better than Masahiro Shimanuki. Heck, i guess people eventually mix him with Fujita, who's easily the worst of all them.
    I'm gonna have to disagree, Fujita and Yokoyama are pretty terrible but their art tends to be a lot more consistent and structurally sound than Takagi's. Sometimes when I look at his episodes I wonder if the characters have been abstracted. The proportions, both body and facial, are very irksome to me and he's not very good at drawing hands most of the time... but again, I thought he did some pretty good work this time around and his movements are definitely better than Fujita's that's for sure.
    Last edited by shinpanman; June 14th, 2009 at 03:49 PM.

  2. #222

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by goty View Post
    I'm realizing Takagi is seriously the most underrated animation director. He's leagues ahead of Masayuki Fujita/Kenji Yokoyama and fairly better than Masahiro Shimanuki. Heck, i guess people eventually mix him with Fujita, who's easily the worst of all them.
    While 397 was pretty average (more due to dragging than his fault), he delivered two other great episodes recently: 389 (Gaon Cannon) and 380 (Binks' sake). And his first episode (4) was the first strong, emotional one in the series.
    His expressive art style did blend perfectly with Luffy's despair on 405.
    I still think his art is not great, everyone faces looked bad. Kizaru looked like shit, and the art in the scenes which non of these 2 animators worked on were kinda average.

    I think people are mixing him up with the great animators...If it wasn't for these 2 animators, I think this episode would have sucked.

    -First animator started from the Gear Second activation up to the end of the first half.
    Some of this animator works: Shishi Sonson and Kuma firing his laser (377), Mugiwara's Docking (367), Luffy raising his hat when talking to Moria in (357), Robin's Wing (347).

    -Second Animator did the the second half up to the flashbacks.
    Some of this animator works: Luffy finishing Oz(373), Law and Kid filler Vs. Kuma(401), First 5 minutes of (382), Kizaru finishing the captains (402).

    The art was totally different from Takagi's average art. Their art was so good that made Takagi art crappy in comparison.
    Last edited by XMURADX; June 14th, 2009 at 05:30 PM.

  3. #223
    Carcharodon Piledriver! Crossword's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Out there

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    What I wonder is why no one on the show other than Inoue, Tate, and Yokoyama can draw Kuma and not have him look like shit. His face isn't exactly complex compared to all the other characters they have to draw, but they always manage to make it look odd. Maybe if they'd just stop giving him those silly-looking thin lips, he'd look better. I mean, between 404 and 405, there looked to be five different people drawing him. Jeez, even I can make him look better.

    Oh well, as I said before, I've learned over the course of my anime viewing that even the lower-tier guys can whip up something good given the right people behind them and the right circumstance. Aside from some weird shots in the beginning, this episode did its job art-wise, I feel.

    It should be a rule that Gear Second should always have animation like that. That was a great showing there.
    Last edited by Crossword; June 15th, 2009 at 01:11 PM.
    ~One Piece anime blog~
    ~Stargazer~, an original story.

    This sig is still wittier than yours.

  4. #224

    Smile Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by Crossword View Post
    What I wonder is why no one on the show other than Inoue and Tate can draw Kuma and not have him look like shit. His face isn't exactly complex compared to all the other characters they have to draw, but they always manage to make it look odd. Maybe if they'd just stop giving him those silly-looking thin lips, he'd look better. I mean, between 404 and 405, there looked to be five different people drawing him. Jeez, even I can make him look better.

    Oh well, as I said before, I've learned over the course of my anime viewing that even the lower-tier guys can whip up something good given the right people behind them and the right circumstance. Aside from some weird shots in the beginning, this episode did its job art-wise, I feel.

    It should be a rule that Gear Second should always have animation like that. That was a great showing there.
    Yes, I must agree with you there, as much as I don't like Tate's style,
    He is the only other person apart from Inoue that can manage to draw Kuma well ...

  5. #225

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by XMURADX View Post
    I think people are mixing him up with the great animators...If it wasn't for these 2 animators, I think this episode would have sucked.
    Actually that sounds weirdly convenient. When there's a good scene, it's "the fantastic and mysterious no named animator" working. When it's not good, it's Takagi to blame.
    I could do that with every episode. Not even Tate's look consistent all the time, as many screenshots from last week's showed. People just tend to be biased with an animation director they don't like, usually prejudging it even before an episode airs.

  6. #226

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    lol...The Best Kuma is Naoki Tate's.
    The first great animator in 405 made him look scary and his body design was great.

    @Goty...That's not true, cause if Takagi was capable of doing such thing he would have done it from long time ago, but since these awesome animators started working recently, they have been shifting around. Great Animators don't work under a specific person, but are given an important scene to do. Long time ago, only Tate was the great animator in One Piece, so you usually find him do the key animation in many episodes he didn't supervise, because he is an animator.

    Tate scene doesn't look good when he doesn't animate them by himself or when they are given to poor animators, because besides supervising, Tate is an animator, I could tell his scenes easily from the rest of the episode.

    In Episode 404 all the greatest One Piece animators worked on it. Not just Tate, that's why I think it was the best animated episode.
    Last edited by XMURADX; June 14th, 2009 at 05:46 PM.

  7. #227

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by XMURADX View Post
    l@Goty...That's not true, cause if Takagi was capable of doing such thing he would have done it from long time ago, but since these awesome animators started working recently, they have been shifting around.
    But Takagi's style was always good to me, i never said anything about a scene by new animator A or B. In fact, episode 4 is one of the best from early OP. Regardless, i still think it's unfair and convenient to steal the credit only when the director isn't one of your favorites.
    Takagi is one of the very few directors these days who's not afraid to try cartoonish, expressive faces like this, this, this and this, which is his trademark. If you rewatch pre-Alabasta episodes, you'll notice that exaggerated expressions were used way more for some reason, it makes his style stands out now. It's also worthy of note how the hairs look all really nice and detailed in his style.
    Honestly, i think that compare his art to Yokoyama's or Fujita's is unreasonable.

  8. #228

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    It's funny, everyone is just talking about the supervisors, and keeps praising them, and they forgot who is really behind the fantastic and amazing scenes.
    I've been praising Naoki Tate, because he was the best animator, until the new ones who are on his level started working during Thriller Bark and even increased up to this point.

    I've never compared Takagi to Yokoyama or Fujita, neither put him on their level. I've been rating Takagi's episodes B to B+ from episode 370. I've never gave him a C+ until I saw his episode 397.
    Takagi is above average, Yokoyama is average and Fujita is just horrible.

    About the pics you posted, Only the Nami shot is actually good. Luffy and Sanji are just meh.
    As we all know, Art style can be subject to opinion, so I really don't want to go there.

    What I really care about and I have been following for the past year is the great animators, who makes your Jaw drop from the awesomeness, cause no matter who is the supervisor as long as the animators are good then the scene will look good. The A-listers have a special touch that makes the episode even more beautiful with the great art.
    Not to forgot that the A-listers always get the great animators working under them. Because they deserve them.

    I really have no problem with average supervisors when they do normal episodes, because I got used to them, but I get annoyed when such an important episode gets handled by them.

    BTW, If you really don't believe me, you can compare the normal Takagi and the scene that the great animators handled. See how different the art look, Robin and Luffy are a very clear example.

  9. #229

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by XMURADX View Post
    The A-listers have a special touch that makes the episode even more beautiful with the great art.
    Not to forgot that the A-listers always get the great animators working under them. Because they deserve them. I really have no problem with average supervisors when they do normal episodes, because I got used to them, but I get annoyed when such an important episode gets handled by them.
    Well, you're still relying on subjective views in the first sentence.
    For instance, some people see that famous screenshot of Luffy by Ishizuka and think it's a godly piece of badassery, while others say it's fugly shit. You know, the kind of thing that happens with Tate too - and pretty much every AD not called Eisaku Inoue..

    Other than him, there isn't a clear "number one" behind the anime that handles every higher budget/major moment - hell, Fujita of all people had his chance on 372, and he was a new guy.
    Anyway, even Inoue has some pretty cheap episodes like 284 in his history, so it's not like they're always stellar, just the bigger ones.
    What i'm saying is that they usually bring the money (and animators) when it matters, regardless of the director.

    Quote Originally Posted by XMURADX View Post
    BTW, If you really don't believe me, you can compare the normal Takagi and the scene that the great animators handled. See how different the art look, Robin and Luffy are a very clear example.
    I think that's irrelevant, the pics i posted were all Takagi's..i know what his art is like,

    Quote Originally Posted by XMURADX View Post
    Takagi is above average, Yokoyama is average and Fujita is just horrible.
    Now that, i agree. I never said Takagi is the best, just that put him down
    with visibly inferior directors is crazy, moreso when the man has some very distinct characteristics that help to keep the show fresh. As i use to say, if the series looked the same way every single week..it would be boring as hell.
    Last edited by goty; June 14th, 2009 at 08:40 PM.

  10. #230
    Carcharodon Piledriver! Crossword's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Out there

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Well, to change things up a bit, I plugged the name of the new guy, Toshio Deguchi, into ANN, and it seems that he's been an animation director for Digimon Savers and the 1996 Gegege no Kitaro series, as well as the character designer for the 1998 series Himitsu no Akko-chan, and did some key animation for Higurashi no Naku Koro Ni Kai (the one with the good art).

    Admittably, that doesn't sound like the most impressive resume to me, but he's apparently been around the block for a while. Hopefully the pattern we've had lately of the new animation directors being good will still hold.
    ~One Piece anime blog~
    ~Stargazer~, an original story.

    This sig is still wittier than yours.

  11. #231

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by goty View Post
    Well, you're still relying on subjective views in the first sentence.
    For instance, some people see that famous screenshot of Luffy by Ishizuka and think it's a godly piece of badassery, while others say it's fugly shit. You know, the kind of thing that happens with Tate too - and pretty much every AD not called Eisaku Inoue..
    What I meant by special touch is that the way they make the episodes, sometimes is even better than the manga.
    -Like how Tate made the punch in 396 or The meeting and Zoro Vs. Oz in 396.
    -Like How Inoue made the Mugiwara Docking in 367, or Robin's wing in 347.

    I wonder why episodes like 312 or 377 and even 404 had a bigger impact on me even though what happened in 405 was one of the biggest things ever.

    When it's Takagi or anyone average, they can never surpass the manga in any scene.

    I really hated how Takagi went cheap on the flashbacks. And when he made Luffy disappear, That was one of my favorite scenes, and Takagi fucked it up. Too bad non of the great animators worked on it.

    Quote Originally Posted by goty View Post
    Other than him, there isn't a clear "number one" behind the anime that handles every higher budget/major moment - hell, Fujita of all people had his chance on 372, and he was a new guy.
    Anyway, even Inoue has some pretty cheap episodes like 284 in his history, so it's not like they're always stellar, just the bigger ones.
    What i'm saying is that they usually bring the money (and animators) when it matters, regardless of the director.
    284 was not amazing animation wise, but the art was great through out the whole episode, that's why he is one of the A-Listers, cause if there is no great animators working under him, at least the art will save the episode.

    Quote Originally Posted by goty View Post
    I think that's irrelevant, the pics i posted were all Takagi's..i know what his art is like,
    I know what you posted were all Takagi's, but I was talking about the great animated scene, the art is totally different, because that was the art\style of the key animator who did the Gear 2nd up to the end of the first half. And the other key animator who worked on the scene were first time Robin appears in the second half up to the flashbacks.

    Let me give you an example...
    -Episode 383 - Nakatani (Gear Third Scene)
    -Episode 261 - Kazuya Hisada (Zoro V.s T-Bone scene)
    -Episode 265 - Masayuki Takagi * (from 19:07)

    In all these scenes Naoki Tate was the key animator. We see clearly Naoki Tate's style even though he didn't supervise the episode.
    Same thing happened in episode 405, The great key animators worked in it just like Tate and they kept their art style. And I have been following these animators froim quite a while, that's why I can tell their art style easily.

    The only problem is that I don't know their names, that's why we give them codenames for now.

    Quote Originally Posted by goty View Post
    Now that, i agree. I never said Takagi is the best, just that put him down
    with visibly inferior directors is crazy, moreso when the man has some very distinct characteristics that help to keep the show fresh. As i use to say, if the series looked the same way every single week..it would be boring as hell.
    I would prefer if the character design was the same through out the whole series...So everyone can get used to one style. Just like FMA.


    @Crossword, I really hope he turns out having good art. We need someone to replace Fujita and Kenji. I'm really sad Nakatani haven't done the ending, I really like her art.

  12. #232
    Carcharodon Piledriver! Crossword's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Out there

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Hey, Yokoyama is the only person on the show aside from Inoue and Tate who can draw Kuma (and is/was arguable more consistent than them) and have him look exactly like Oda's art the majority of the time. Just for that, he can stay. Fujita, well, unless he's conserving all of his awesome for another 372 and has to build up to it, eh, I could care less about whether he stays or goes.

    As for gripes about stuff like the non-reanimated flashbacks, I get the feeling that stuff like that is more up to the episode directors and the budget rather than the animation directors, but I'm no expect as to the inner workings and cogs of the animation process.
    ~One Piece anime blog~
    ~Stargazer~, an original story.

    This sig is still wittier than yours.

  13. #233
    move over anpanman shinpanman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Maryland

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    I for one am glad they just used old footage for the flashbacks. Better than seeing them reanimated by Takagi, not because he's bad, but because some of those flashback scenes were gorgeous originally.

    I really liked the animators that worked on Robin and Monster Chopper in the second half of 405 though. Wish I could tell who they were.

  14. #234

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    @Crossword, I do agree with you to some extent, I really loved Kenji's 360, 376 and 400. But his art on the Strawhats ranges from decent to Ugly.

    @shinpanman...I really love that animator as well, he did the whole scene including the luffy breakdown scene. Extremely fluid animation. I call him Mr.Y (Cause his style is close to Hiroyuki Yamashita).

    Here is all the scenes he worked on:
    -Luffy's fight in ID in the opening
    -Kid and Law Vs. Kuma filler (401)
    -Kizaru finishing the 4 captains (402)
    -Luffy finishing Oz (373)
    -Zoro walking at the end of the episode, and his killer intent against the bounty hunters. (395)
    -Sanji was smoking 3 cigarettes and the whole scene were the SH were flying to the human shop. (395)
    -The starting of the filler episode 382 were Luffy, Usopp and Chopper are playing up to the moment Nami beats Sanji. (382)
    -Luffy's fight against the bounty hunters at the start of the episode (392)
    -The introduction of the Supernovas (392)
    -From the moment Robin appears in the second half up to when the flashbacks starts (405).
    -The scene were Kuma punches Bebpo in episode (404).

    He is a new animator his first work was in episode 373. I really hope he stays. The only episode were his art changed was in Ishizuka's episode (401). Looks like Ishizuka likes to keep his episodes consistent art wise.
    Also his work in 404 had tate's style, but cause it was a few seconds scene he tried to keep it consistent with Tate, since Tate worked on most of the filler scene in 404.

    About the flashbacks, some were gorgeous like the Brook one, but some were bad. And I wanted it to be consistent, just like the flashbacks in 312.
    And One Piece needs new music and sad tracks, I hope they don't milk Bink's Sake.
    Last edited by XMURADX; June 17th, 2009 at 05:53 PM.

  15. #235
    UNIVEEEEEEEERRRRRRSE! loledinmypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Soriel, MI

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    I second the need for new music. I've noticed some new I guess you'd describe it as "forboding" type music, but they need new sad music. The happy music can actually stay pretty much the same imo, just the sad music really needs to stop being the same one or two tracks with apparently now Bink's Sake thrown in.
    On a more on topic note: I liked the animation at the end of 405, but they could have done with some movements being less exaggerated, at least imo.


  16. #236
    Carcharodon Piledriver! Crossword's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Out there

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Yeah, the anime doesn't really make any new music unless it's for a movie, or for Brook's eyecatch (Franky's, while awesome, was from a much earlier piece). I would have loved it if they had used the bit from Grand Line: Cold that I posted in the 404 thread at the end, but Mother Sea works as well.

    Many of the songs have multiple parts to them, but they're largely underutilized, which is a shame, since One Piece has some truly great music. There's a part of Zoro's theme music that I think will be great for Impel Down, but I doubt we'll get to hear it.
    ~One Piece anime blog~
    ~Stargazer~, an original story.

    This sig is still wittier than yours.

  17. #237
    UNIVEEEEEEEERRRRRRSE! loledinmypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Soriel, MI

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by Crossword View Post
    Yeah, the anime doesn't really make any new music unless it's for a movie, or for Brook's eyecatch (Franky's, while awesome, was from a much earlier piece). I would have loved it if they had used the bit from Grand Line: Cold that I posted in the 404 thread at the end, but Mother Sea works as well.

    Many of the songs have multiple parts to them, but they're largely underutilized, which is a shame, since One Piece has some truly great music. There's a part of Zoro's theme music that I think will be great for Impel Down, but I doubt we'll get to hear it.
    Well hopefully Movie 10 gives us good new music for next year at least. Don't think they'd have any reason to change anything before then, unfortunately. Trailer for movie 10 makes it seem like there's a good chance for a major upgrade to the soundtrack used for the episodes.


  18. #238

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by Crossword View Post
    Yeah, the anime doesn't really make any new music unless it's for a movie, or for Brook's eyecatch (Franky's, while awesome, was from a much earlier piece). I would have loved it if they had used the bit from Grand Line: Cold that I posted in the 404 thread at the end, but Mother Sea works as well.

    Many of the songs have multiple parts to them, but they're largely underutilized, which is a shame, since One Piece has some truly great music. There's a part of Zoro's theme music that I think will be great for Impel Down, but I doubt we'll get to hear it.
    Eh? I dunno, I think I've been hearing some new music lately.
    Check out my tumblr for my thoughts on random movies and manga^^

    http://lion-kun.tumblr.com/

  19. #239
    UNIVEEEEEEEERRRRRRSE! loledinmypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Soriel, MI

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Quote Originally Posted by Thousand Lion-chan View Post
    Eh? I dunno, I think I've been hearing some new music lately.
    I heard a few new ones, but some of the "new" stuff is just tracks from movie 9's soundtrack. And the fact that there hasn't been a new sad bit of music in a long time coupled with the misuse (imo) of the main piece of sad music they've been using in that one Perona scene, makes me impatient for them to have something else, something new. Robin's wing scene and Urouge's bulking up I believe had new pieces, but that's all i can recall offhand.


  20. #240
    Rumbar Pirate Palochka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area

    Default Re: A Study of One Piece Animation

    Since we're in for quite a bit of filler, the lack of new background musics won't be all too noticeable and I'm willing to assume that the animators will begin to dip into the Movie 10 vault for the month before it's released or even sooner (that's about when Impel Down will start if they spend 10 episodes on filler, right?)


+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts