We're a democratic republic.
We can multitask.
Well, we do say "and for the republic for which it stands."
We elect people to represent us and then hope they do their jobs. We can only hope that loyalty and fear of not being re-elected will keep the system straight, but I'm not really convinced that it has.
In a pure Democracy, every citizen would have equal power to decide matters of state. That would probably be a pretty disorganized and ineffective system, which is why we have a Republic.
Our system doesn't work because people in this country are incredibly gullible. If a candidate wins an election and doesn't do the things that s/he promised to do (or at the very least, work towards them), then sham on that candidate for being a liar or otherwise useless politician. But when that candidate comes out every couple of years making the same promises and getting re-elected again and again, the fault then lies with the people voting this person into office.
All this talk about fixing Washington and the corrupt political system is completely wasted because nothing will change until the voters get a clue and start voting for people that are more practical and honest about what they can and can't do in office and not the person that tells them everything they want to hear.
That is a Democracy. Not a direct Democracy but so what. Doesn't absolve it of being a Democracy. I'm pretty sure no country now or ever has been a direct Democracy. Though some have instituted it in some things.
This has nothing to do with whether a state is a Republic. A Republic is basically a government that operates around the interest of the public in it's theory. This covers both absolute communist dictatorships, some military juntas and direct democracies.In a pure Democracy, every citizen would have equal power to decide matters of state. That would probably be a pretty disorganized and ineffective system, which is why we have a Republic.
Sweden, where people can browse the emails of their head of state is a republic.
Burma, where people are shot for suggesting policy change is a republic.
Both governments claim to act in express interest of the people. The structure is publically motivated on paper.
You know the Prohibition? Where criminal organizations made a killing (literally) off of illegal goods?
You hear about the dead men, women and children in Mexico and other places?
Just sayin'.
(P.S. I know that Prop 19 alone won't fix the problem, but it's a start.)
But weed is scary and mean.
We had a lesson on Prohibition once in my history class, and after the class was over everyone generally agreed it was a bad thing.
The next day I brought up the possible link to marijuana with my teacher and she literally recoiled with horror at the thought of legalization.
With some people, it seems there's some huge social stigma associated with weed that I can't understand. I bet she has a dozen students who smoke it too.
I would rather smoke weed then tobacco anyday.
Me too, although I'd rather stay away from them both.
I like to consider myself an athlete.
All the protective coddling we get in elementary through high school instills that stigma (which isn't that bad when you're young as long as you can learn to look at things objectively and rationally when you grow up). Of course I can see what a bunch of fearmongering bullshit D.A.R.E. is now, but as impressionable 4th grader? I was sold.
But wait. You're.... in Toronto? The school you're talking about must not have been, right?
Mangarule Scans (with my translations):
http://mangarule.altervista.org/blog/blog/
DA Account (including OP stuff):
http://awasai.deviantart.com/
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)