
Originally Posted by
The Beast
A lot of the music predating the 1920s I most loved was stuff I couldn't play with anyways, or was less likely to, as a cellist. Like French impressionism, which lends itself beautifully to personal touch and influence (compared to like Bach, which has two modes: Glenn Gould and everybody else; boring) but is basically piano or bust. Debussy or Monet
I was always big with Sibelius, Mahler, Dvorak, Mussorgsky, Wagner, or shit but by the time I was working with half and half on music I actually liked, it was too much and I knew I just had to duck. I had tons of fun and loved it while it lasted at least. But when I played in symphonic stuff I was always critic first, player second and had so much more fun just like
Getting out of it.
--- Update From New Post Merge ---
My jazz teacher could suck a boner, I'm playing Mingus my way